Timeline for Were those two questions about circular security really duplicates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2020 at 11:04 | vote | accept | Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira | ||
| Dec 31, 2019 at 0:58 | answer | added | Maarten BodewesMod | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 12, 2019 at 16:01 | comment | added | Ella Rose Mod | Would you like to post/accept that as an answer? That way readers of Meta will know that the issue is solved. | |
| Dec 12, 2019 at 14:08 | comment | added | Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira | @EllaRose when created this question on Meta.crypto I did not know that the merge was irreversible. So, given that and the edits made by MaartenBodewes, I think this issue is solved. | |
| Dec 12, 2019 at 3:55 | comment | added | Ella Rose Mod | So did we conclude or decide anything about this situation? Is there still an issue? | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 20:49 | comment | added | Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira | @MaartenBodewes I think that was a good workaround. Thank you for the edit you made there. | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 11:19 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes Mod | The author had indicated that he saw it as a dupe, and if the answers fulfil the question then it is often considered a dupe. However, we can expand the question in such a way that AES is just an example. Would that satisfy your issues with this? I merged the answers so that they would stay even if the dupe would be removed, and to centralize the knowledge. | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 9:38 | comment | added | SEJPM Mod | Even if these questions were not actually duplicates, they were merged and merges are irreversible (which is why they are a mod-only tool). Well, at least they're irreversible for mods. | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 8:03 | history | asked | Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |