Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with editing
Search options not deleted
user 49826
6
votes
4
answers
218
views
Should we accept edits by non-authors to put Wikipedia links on phrases?
We have had a number of edits recently that just put Wikipedia links on phrases, in posts that the editor was not the author of. Is this a desirable practice?
For example, in https://crypto.stackexc …
- 49.5k
4
votes
Should we accept edits by non-authors to put Wikipedia links on phrases?
No. This is not desirable because it does not necessarily reflect the author's intent, and Wikipedia is a notoriously bad reference on cryptography so it is likely to be misleading at best and change …
- 49.5k
3
votes
Should we edit names and acronyms that are not spelled correctly?
We don't need any new rules: the help center already endorses fixing spelling mistakes.
Any such changes should be individually justified and should not counteract the author's reasonable style choic …
- 49.5k