3
$\begingroup$

Currently we have both of these tags:

  • (40 questions)
  • (85 questions)

Both are basically the same algorithm, just implemented over different groups. Would it make sense to merge ECDSA into DSA and use and if the question is group specific?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Mission complete. $\endgroup$
    – e-sushi
    Jul 12 '15 at 14:36
1
$\begingroup$

Merging with – and accordingly making ECDSA a synonym of DSA – makes sense to me. Especially, when looking at your argumentation related to the availability for group-specific tagging when needed.

Based on that, maybe we should handle ECDH in an alike manner… meaning: could be merged with . The tag could then be used to differ ECDH from other DH, and ECDH could be made a synonym of DH.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .