5
$\begingroup$

Just noticed we’ve got two alike tags:


  • Multiple encryption means encrypting a message two or more times using either the same, or a different algorithm.

  • Double encryption is the process of encrypting a message multiple times, either using the same or a different algorithm.

Both practically describe the same.

Because “double encryption” seems to be one of many forms of “multiple encryption”, I would like to suggest making a tag synonym of .

As you’ll notice, is merely used by this question. Meaning: we could also simply replace that double-encryption tag and let the tag fade out, but chances are that someone else will come along and use that tag again… so I guess making it a synonym of the multi-encryption tag could be the smarter move. What do you think?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Well, arguably the tag excerpt is wrong, since double encryption means.. double encryption. As in 'twice'. But I agree, double-encryption is too specific as a tag IMHO. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Sep 5 '14 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Thomas Yep, that tag description isn’t the best. Whatever… the way I interpret things is that double-encryption is indeed encrypting it twice – aka “more than once”, which would also make it fit the multiple-encryption tag from the more-than-once perspective. Yet, I’m not saying I’m seeing things correctly in this case, that’s why I’ve thrown it in here for discussion. ;) $\endgroup$ – e-sushi Sep 5 '14 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ What's wrong if both of the tags exist? Does same meaning tags create any problem? $\endgroup$ – Giliweed Sep 7 '14 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ It looks like this has to be done by a moderator, since there are not enough users to vote on it. $\endgroup$ – Artjom B. Sep 8 '14 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Giliweed There’s no actual “problem”. It’s more of a keeping-things-clean thing, as double-encryption is somewhat redundant due to the existence of multiple-encryption. $\endgroup$ – e-sushi Sep 8 '14 at 10:28
1
$\begingroup$

I removed from the one in question. If it ends up popping up again in the future, we can consider blacklisting it.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .