0
$\begingroup$

I'm writing a paper for first time. I am thinking of citing this list (awesome-mpc) along with some survey papers on the Related Work section. Of course a lot of other related stuff will be mentioned in the Related Work section apart for those. This list have helped me a lot in my research, of course it is not a survey just a public index of common smpc frameworks and this is why I will reference some survey papers along with it. I want to ask if you think it will be kind of "low quality" citation for my paper?

PS1 : The journal is an MDPI journal.

PS2 : IMHO this list is a very good start for a survey paper if anyone is interested.

PS3 : I haven't found any kind of awesome-lists being referenced in publications and this list doesn't have an a CITATION.cff file .

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possibly more suited for a mention / thank you than a citation, but I don't have that much experience so I haven't put that in as an answer :| $\endgroup$
    – Maarten Bodewes Mod
    Nov 17, 2022 at 23:03
  • $\begingroup$ The quality of the citation depends largely on the relevance to your paper's contents, rather than on it (not) being a peer-reviewed journal article. I don't think this is on-topic here (crypto.meta SE). $\endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 15, 2022 at 15:00

0

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .