Having given it a week for potential feedback from community members, I have now closed the question as a duplicate, based on the already indicated fact that “Who uses the RSA BSAFE library?”“Who uses the RSA BSAFE library?” merely reboots what has been asked before… “Who uses Dual_EC_DRBG?”“Who uses Dual_EC_DRBG?”
Details
The (now closed as a duplicate) question “Who uses the RSA BSAFE library?”“Who uses the RSA BSAFE library?” asks:
My question: Who uses RSA BSAFE? Which products are built on top of RSA BSAFE?
This is a reformulation of the question “Who uses Dual_EC_DRBG?”“Who uses Dual_EC_DRBG?”:
My question: who uses Dual_EC_DRBG? Do any commercial products use Dual_EC_DRBG?
Nota Bene – The accepted answer of that older question shows the obvious point of inspiration:
RSA BSAFE Libraries (Both for Java and C/C++) use it as their default PRNG.
Besides all that, the now closed question only attracted a single answer… which was never accepted. Therefore I honestly doubt much is lost by the closure. (Also, market-penetration questions are overly broad and always incorporate personal opinions – unless actual numbers are known to the public.)